René Riedl (JKU bzw. FH Steyr), Mark Stieninger (FH Steyr), Manuel Mühlburger, Stefan Koch (beide JKU Business School, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik - Information Engineering) und Thomas Hess (LMU München) untersuchen die praktische Wahrnehmung der digitalen Transformation in ihrem kürzlich veröffentlichten Artikel "What is digital tansformation? A survey on the perceptions of decision-makers in business", öffnet eine externe URL in einem neuen Fenster.
In den letzten Jahren dominieren konzeptionelle und theoretische Arbeiten die Diskussionen rund um das Phänomen der digitalen Transformation. Die vorliegende Arbeit ergänzt diese Diskussion um einen empirischen Blick auf die praktische Wahrnehmung des Phänomens. Basierend auf Umfragedatendaten von 529 EntscheidungsträgerInnen identifiziert die Arbeit zentrale Disrepanzen zwischen dem aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Diskurs und der praktischen Wahrnehmung. Damit trägt die Arbeit wesentlich zu einem verbesserten Verständnis der digitalen Transformation in der Praxis bei.
Abstract
In the past years we have observed enormous adoption and use of digital technologies in almost all domains of human life. In this context, researchers and practitioners have been using the term “digital transformation” (DT) to characterize phenomena related to the changes caused by increased use of digital technologies. The progression and contributions of corresponding discussions significantly depend on a common understanding and conceptualization of DT. Accordingly, the information systems research community has started working toward conceptual clarity. Importantly, the current debate focuses on theoretical contributions by academic researchers. Hence, data on the practitioners’ perspective on DT is missing. Against this background, we investigated general understandings of DT in practice. Our analysis comprises data of N = 529 business decision-makers in the UK. Our results show a significant discrepancy between science (i.e., conceptualizations and definitions of DT in the academic literature) and practice (i.e., business decision-makers’ perceptions and corresponding survey responses). Specifically, for a large proportion of the respondents their decision to classify concrete digitalization examples from the literature as DT or no DT was largely independent of the degree of organizational change caused by the use of digital technologies. This is a surprising result, as high-caliber academic literature proposes this degree to be a critical factor to characterize DT. Another key finding is that a remarkable number of practitioners consider a digitalization initiative as DT based on the mere occurrence of specific buzzwords related to digital technologies in the corresponding descriptions. In particular, the buzzword “digital technology” led the survey participants to classify a definition as instance for DT. We discuss implications of our results and limitations.
